nmallia Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 Hi The attached article has been prepared to compare the suspension setup of the Spitfire Mk IV and that of the GT6 Mk2 to the suspension setup of the Lotus Elan that has been regarded as one of the best handing small sports cars ever produced. The similarities of the front suspension will be highlighted as well as the compromised solutions at the rear. Finally modifications are presented to bring a triumph small chassis suspension to perform remarkably close to that of the Lotus Elan. I hope you find this interesting & useful. Nicky Triumph small chassis suspension optimisation..pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jones Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 Nicky, That's a fine piece of work. It will take me a little while to fully digest it, but I reckon I'm going to be mostly agreeing with you as we produced something pretty similar for our Spitfire a couple of years back. It didn't occur to us to try and control the deflection shape of the spring though and in fact we are still using the MkIV spring complete with centre pivot. The car drives nicely and handles well but is purely a road car with a standard 1300 engine and not driven especially hard, so perhaps not a definitive test. Have you actually built one to test yet? Also a question about the MkIV/1500 examples shown - are they using the long or short driveshafts? Not sure how much difference it makes? Cheers Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnD Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 NIce, Nicky! Would be good to include some of your excellent drawings of the Lotus setup too. Sometime ago, before CAD, I analysed the same thing. Appeared in the TSSC's Courier, and is now repribted on this site. Hope you're interested! See: John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmallia Posted July 18, 2018 Author Share Posted July 18, 2018 Hi The drawings are of an early Spit IV short axle (48inch track) The later cars with longer axles (50inch) have a 6mm lower Roll Center. Its a marginal improvement. I had seen the pics of your car before and they included in the 'case cars' folder i have compiled over the years I should be testing the system at the end of september. I will naturally keep you posted. Nicky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmallia Posted July 18, 2018 Author Share Posted July 18, 2018 Nice article John!. I had seen this before and had taken notes of it. As you said CAD drawings allows the designer to presenst a full picture, moreover as you draw stuff to scale you start making discoveries of things you had not thought of before. Nicky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yorkshire_spam Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Really interesting read, thanks for sharing Nicky - I love a bit of modeling in FEA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egret Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Really interesting stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmallia Posted October 1, 2018 Author Share Posted October 1, 2018 Hi everyone. We have some good progress in the prototype build. Attached are some images. I have fitted everyting loosly and it all seems to add up (so far). Will keep u posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnD Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 Those dampers are acutely Angled even with the weight off the car. As the suspension goes i to bump they willgomoreandmore horizontal, and ineffective. Suggest you get, or fabricate your own version, of the brAckets that put the upper end three inches further out. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jones Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 Looks good to me Nicky - and somewhat familiar. Do wonder a bit what effect that spring stop, and the sudden change in spring rate it will bring, is going to feel like. Dampers are pretty much as fitted to all swing axle cars John. Yes, a fairly steep angle and increasing with bump, giving a falling rate, but this was designed in by ST at the outset. It is, as you say, fairly straight forward to fabricate brackets to bring the dampers more upright and increase their effect rate, but if adjustable dampers are fitted, not perhaps necessary. Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 Just stumbled across this thread, must have read it first time around, but very interesting. I am still working on the mk3 Spitfire, I was going to replace the fixed spring with the later mk4, 1500, swing spring. But after reading this thread it's got me thinking. Possibly got some Roto rear uprights somewhere, just everything else I need, but whilst I have a bare chassis infront of me, maybe it's something I should think about having a go at. Seen Nickys Spitfire on YouTube, one very quick, excellent handling Spit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnD Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 A most interesting thread, Mark! Thanks for reviving. You have seen Nicky Mallia's Spitfire online? Sad to say, he never followed up the above posts with actual handling reports. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escadrille Ecosse Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 Don't remember seeing this so thanks for reviving it Mark. I have seen a Cooper rear suspension in the flesh and the biggest, and I think most significant, difference in the mounting arrangement is that the load is taken into the chassis only at the the two points part way along the spring. The centre clamp bracket is only there to prevent the spring from moving side to side as the load sleeves have to allow the spring slide a little as it bends. The Corvette C5 monoleaf composite spring is mounted in a very similar manner although that suspension uses top and bottom wishbones. The centre portion of the spring is completely free to move up and down so it is not forced into the double curvature shown on Nicky's CAD model of his design. I suspect this would cause a rather harsh ride and maybe eventually overstress the spring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now