Jump to content

104433 Input Shaft Bearing - sources


RichardB

Recommended Posts

Like many I've been trying to source some good quality bearings and today some KSM branded ones arrived in the post.

The part is labelled 'KSM RMS8N JAPAN LOT .190822'

I don't have any of the allegedly poor quality KOR ones to compare it to but later this week I'll take a photo of it next to the RHP one I've got.

Just posting this in case it's useful to anyone else. Without specialised equipment or time I can't comment on the quality, but having more sources for these parts is always helpful and hopefully these perform well.

I got them here - https://www.autogear.uk.com/triumph-spitfire-1500-mk4-gearbox-input-shaft-bearing.html

Not cheap at 23 pounds plus postage but they arrived quickly at least.

IMG-20230117-WA0000.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Previously I've been able to source FAFNIR branded MJ1N (note: no R, so no snap-ring you have to save your old one!) from Hendersons (https://www.hendersonbearings.co.uk/mj1n-1x2-1-2x3-4-single-row-ball-bearing-brand-fafnir.html) but now listed as "Availability: On Request - Please add to quote"

I think @wimpus previously build a 'box for FQX using KSM bearings, he might express an opinion on their quality.

My notes on x-fer for these are: 
 

Quote

front/rear bearing - 8MJ1N (RHP)
Or rms8n or 8/MJ1NR (MJ1NR Imperial Open Snap Ring Brg 1x2-1/2x3/4 inch)
Fag MS10K
Bmc 104433

But use at your own risk!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not easy photographing these with a phone but I can't see anything that suggests they're any weaker by design than the RHP version. Suppose you'd need specialist equipment to test their strength properly.

What's obvious though is they are different to the KOR ones sold by suppliers. I did have a slight concern they might be rebranded KOR ones but the design is different from the photos I've found online of the KOR bearings.

IMG-20230120-WA0000.jpg

IMG-20230120-WA0001.jpg

Edited by RichardB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Size and number of balls is a good indicator usually. Bigger is better.

ISTR a previous discussion on this matter (though possibly not on this forum) where someone reckoned that it was much easier to source them without the external groove (even original spec RHP?). In these days of tipped tooling, getting the groove cut would be no big deal, though undoubtedly more economical to do a reasonable size batch of them…..  Or do I imagine this….?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/17/2023 at 3:15 PM, RichardB said:

Just posting this in case it's useful to anyone else. Without specialised equipment or time I can't comment on the quality, but having more sources for these parts is always helpful and hopefully these perform well.

I got them here - https://www.autogear.uk.com/triumph-spitfire-1500-mk4-gearbox-input-shaft-bearing.html

Not cheap at 23 pounds plus postage but they arrived quickly at least.

Interesting, I bought bearings from this shop before, and was also suspicious. It was back in 2017 and they sent me NTN ones, I was also worried they were counterfeit (since you can't buy NTN RMS8N anywhere), but like you decided they looked nothing like the KOR ones, and everything about the machining on them looked decent to me:
IMG_20171225_165623.thumb.jpg.6c5c6fee6a2d709eae2c45141110cf88.jpg
(This is the only photo I have of them)

FWIW those NTN were still fine at 20,000 miles when we sold the car.

I now have some SKF ones that need a groove cutting in them, like Nick says. Maybe one day soon I'll finally build up the close ratio gearbox I've spent almost 4 years collecting parts for... I recently needed LJ1 bearings for a driveshaft rebuild, seems like all imperial ball bearings became increasingly expensive and hard to find other than from budget manufacturers with no reputation.

Edited by JumpingFrog
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@JumpingFrogThat's good news regarding the NTN ones and thanks as I think I found the firm from your link on the CT forum!

I've found it quite hard finding anything useful online about bearing manufacturers but it seems like Japan is full of them. I suppose not having a western consumer facing presence doesn't mean they wouldn't be capable of making decent quality things. Even with the Chinese offerings it's usually poor because its made to a price point, not because they can't make them well.

For these particular ones the firm KSM are quite widely sold as 'branded' for other vehicles and Heathrow Transmissions sell them as a premium offering for 1275 boxes. All I could initially find about the firm when searching 'KSM' is "Minamiguchi Bearing Mfg. Co. was established in 1958, in Sakai City, Osaka, Japan." which seems to check out as theres old looking boxes of their 'KSM' bearings knocking about for sale on eBay. But once you search for the name Minamiguchi their website comes up  -http://www.minamiguchi.co.jp/en/

Osaka is on my list of places to visit next time I go to Japan, maybe I could call in? :biggrin:

You're right on RHP bearings @Nick Jones, I can easily find the same bearing without the groove from them or SKF. I wonder if Triumphs were the only places the groove was required, or whether this particular bearing was used on something else.

 

Edited by RichardB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found another source for the bearings. I spoke to Bearingsrus and they quoted me just over £17 each posted for 4 which is pretty competitive, putting them close to what the Triumph suppliers charge for KOR. They don't normally stock them but are able to order them.

One thing to mention, these probably are CN rather than C3 fit like the original Triumph bearings, but I dont know whether the others on the market (SKF, KOR, NTN) etc are C3 either. If the SKF bearing was the same as their RMS8 then it was CN.

Edited by RichardB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My order of KSM bearings from Bearingsrus arrived today, interestingly they're different! In a good way though. These are labelled RMS8NR and come with the snap ring already installed. The fit is still correct but the manufacture appears slightly different. Not sure why that would be but you can see in the photos they have a different shape of nubs in the ring over the ball bearings and the face is very slightly different. Neither bearing is the same as KOR fortunately. 

These also came with KSM boxes and sealed bags, giving further confidence that these are genuine.

 

IMG-20230127-WA0000.jpg

IMG-20230127-WA0001.jpg

IMG-20230127-WA0002.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard, interesting how different they are.

Are you sure that the original gearbox bearings are C3? I know that the 6205 output bearings in the diff are C3, but I've never seen any RMS8 or MJ1 sold as C3 and all the original bearings from gearboxes I've dismantled were just marked "Hoffmann MS10K".

Edited by JumpingFrog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 months or so ago I had not problems sourcing the non-snapring (no groove) bearings from good branded makers. Now, they also seem relatively expensive. I was lucky enough to get the last 2 RHP RMS8 bearings from my local supplier years ago when I actually rebuilt my current box. 

I've never used C3 bearings, I think @wimpus has though. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be misinformed about them being originally spec'ed as C3, I think I read it from a well known character on a post here but good news if they're not. That was from someone building them for high revs which would I guess subject them to more heat and subsequently expansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

It's great that you shared your experience with KSM bearings! This information could be helpful to others looking for good quality replacement bearings.

You received KSM RMS8N JAPAN LOT .190822 bearings.

You haven't compared them directly to the allegedly lower quality KOR bearings, but you'll be comparing them to an RHP bearing later.

Without specialized equipment, it's difficult to definitively assess quality, but having more suppliers for bearings is a positive thing. You can also check quality ball bearings from https://en.tradebearings.com/clist_7.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...