michaeljf Posted March 15, 2020 Posted March 15, 2020 Hello, You may have seen on various topics here I have been rebuilding a TR6 motor. Well I have just had the FINAL bit of work done on it (Nitrided, checked for straightness and linished) put on the carrier,signed for and it didn't arrive at their depot !! My question is, is there advantage between a short back and long back crank (It was a short back). Other work done included,crack test,edge of bearing surface checked for "roundness"(no sharp edges to start cracks) 7 bolts+dowel flywheel attachment,re-balance . Regards,Michael.
michaeljf Posted March 16, 2020 Author Posted March 16, 2020 Hello again, Guess what, suppose you may have heard the saying..""Fell off the back of a truck"...apparently it did. A bloke happened to stop and check something in his ute and saw a largish parcel laying on the side of the road (my crank) and saved it ..but had to leave for the USA at 4 AM the following morning so it sat in the back of his ute for three weeks. He found the address of the business where it was checked for straightness (about 20 kms.from where he found it)and returned it there where it is now having a re- check for straightness ! Hopefully I won't have to start again. Anyone know of any differences between the short/long back cranks (apart from the obvious ).Regards,Michael.
Nick Jones Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 Bad luck followed by better luck! Hopefully it will be fine. Differences.... well, I don't consider myself an expert but the obvious difference is that the long back cranks have a longer boss at the rear which moves the flywheel back (I think to allow a thinner, lighter flywheel without changing the clutch measurements). Presumably TR5 and (some) early PI saloon. Some of them were cross-drilled as well but perhaps not all. Short back cranks are more common by far. Hopefully Mr Thompson may see this and chip in as he knows about these things......
michaeljf Posted March 17, 2020 Author Posted March 17, 2020 Hello Nick, I have another crank (and block but possibly not related) which is short backed and some of the journals are cross drilled. A 2.5 PI sedan motor (long back) which I have used the short backed flywheel (machined about 1.5mm ,larger hub) on.
toofast2race Posted March 18, 2020 Posted March 18, 2020 (edited) Hello Nick :-) The difference is 5/8" of an inch or 16mm. All long back cranks that I have seen are crossdrilled and some early Mk2 2500 1968/69 TR6 cranks are crossdrilled also. Apparently TR250 were NOT crossdrilled but I've not seen one to verify - anyone? So all TR5 and all 2.5PI Mk1 are crossdrilled and 5/8" longer. All Mk2 and TR6 are short - early ones are cross drilled. Beware NOS Mk1 crossdrilled cranks - they tend to break (poorly machined factory rejects??) Edited March 18, 2020 by toofast2race More info
Nick Jones Posted March 18, 2020 Posted March 18, 2020 Thanks for that Andy Trust all is well with you and yours?
toofast2race Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 All good here despite the current madness! Bit slack for work (temp 40% pay cut) so plenty of jobs going to get done over the next few months
michaeljf Posted March 20, 2020 Author Posted March 20, 2020 Hello, My engine No.cc25539HE is short backed and not cross-drilled, have another short back that has some journals that are cross drilled and will have to pull a cap off the motor MG2412HEBW (long back )that had spent a few klms. in the car to see what it is. Will also give some measurements when I get the wayward crank back. Regards,Michael.
michaeljf Posted April 6, 2020 Author Posted April 6, 2020 Hello all, Well the wayward crank has returned. A correction to my last post!(it's that long since I had a good look and my declining mind) it is a long back (1 5/8", 42mm) Here are a couple of photo's after all it's treatments and travelling + its flywheel. I had better see if I can start a thread ? for the rebuild. Regards,Michael.
Nick Jones Posted April 6, 2020 Posted April 6, 2020 Good news it made it home safe - even if it took a while! Long backed alright. But not X-drilled. Flywheel has lost a bit of weight! Is it the original matching one from the that crank?
michaeljf Posted April 7, 2020 Author Posted April 7, 2020 Hello Nick, I don't know if it is the original...but it is the one that was on the crank when I dismantled the motor. (it has a K stamped into it among other things) lots of different things on this motor. Will tell as I describe and attach some photo's in the build thread when I get started. After I finish helping a mate build a shed for a motor-home. You probably noticed the spacer in the flywheel? Will explain later. Regards,Michael.
michaeljf Posted February 26, 2023 Author Posted February 26, 2023 Hello All, Well the thread did get started, and has been a bit ( well very ) long winded. Hence " One step forward two back". The spacer is because I used the flywheel on a Mk2 2.5 PI sedan motor (Auto.) and is actually rotating again on its original crank! Regards, Michael.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now